QUARANTINEZ
treating an outcome the venue never confirmed as terminal rather than as a retry.
An outcome nobody can confirm is not a failure to retry. It is a terminal state, and no code path here escapes it except to a quarantine record naming a person.
- Tests
- 91
- Python
- 3.11 to 3.13
- Release
- v0.1.0
- Licence
- MIT
The demo, as it really ran
$ uv run python examples/venue_session.py
Five orders against five venues. Only one of them ends with an answer.
>>> place(order, venue='well behaved')
FILLED
>>> place(order, venue='accepts then goes quiet')
UNKNOWN via SILENCE
>>> place(order, venue='acknowledges twice')
UNKNOWN via DOUBLE_ACK
>>> place(order, venue='answers about something else')
UNKNOWN via FOREIGN_ID
>>> place(order, venue='fills a quantity nobody sent')
UNKNOWN via UNASKED_QUANTITY
4 of 5 ended unconfirmed. None of them is a failure to retry:
each is a terminal state, and each is handed to a person by name.
The breaker, walked over the committed marks. Every number below is invented.
date mark drawdown breaker obligation
2026-01-15 108.4 0.000 ARMED NONE
2026-01-26 96.1 0.113 TRIPPED OPEN
2026-01-27 94.7 0.126 TRIPPED OPEN
2026-01-28 93.2 0.140 TRIPPED OPEN
2026-01-29 92.1 0.150 TRIPPED UNKNOWN
2026-01-30 93.4 0.138 TRIPPED UNKNOWN
2026-02-02 94.8 0.125 TRIPPED UNKNOWN
2026-02-03 95.6 0.118 TRIPPED UNKNOWN
2026-02-04 96.9 0.106 TRIPPED UNKNOWN
2026-02-05 97.7 0.099 TRIPPED UNKNOWN
The breaker tripped on 2026-01-26 and the position stayed open past the window, so the obligation is UNKNOWN.
Flattening afterwards leaves it UNKNOWN.
A window that closed with exposure open is a fact about the past, and closing the
position later does not reach back into it.
Output captured on 2026-08-26. It is committed to the repository and a test fails when it stops matching a live run, so this page cannot quietly drift from the code it describes.
Read it
- Source on GitHub the README carries the argument in full
- Release v0.1.0 changelog and tag
The rest of the toolset
- QUACKZ deflating a backtest that only looks good because it was picked out of two hundred
- QUOTEZ market data an agent can read and cannot act on
- QUELLZ measuring what prompt-injection containment costs in utility as well as in attack rate
- QUIDZ refusing the outbound payment that would have gone out twice
- QUESTZ stopping a scraper before it writes a CSV from a page that changed shape
- QUIZZ answering what a statistic said at the time, and refusing when it cannot
- QUENCHZ deciding in the open what a tool server gets free while it is still somebody's subprocess
- QUILTZ proving infrastructure code wrong without a cloud account, and saying what that cannot show
- QUAYZ telling a crash loop from an OOMKill, and naming the failure that no single field finds
- QUARRYZ keeping every version a statistical office published, and failing the build when it quietly issues another
- QUASHZ refusing a row whose outcome had not been decided yet when the decision would have been made
- QUALMZ a fixed number of looks at the holdout, where re-running the same configuration does not buy another
- QUEUEZ ordering a feed by its sequence, because on a real recorded session the clock goes backwards
- QUANDARYZ counting the distinct screens a component can settle into when its responses arrive out of order